Seismic Fragility of the SMART Tunnel Under Near-Field Earthquakes

Authors

  • Syarifah Salwania Syed Mohd Zin University Malaysia Perlis Author
  • Nik Zainab Nik Azizan University Malaysia Perlis Author
  • Ronal Hamonangan Tua Simbolon Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30743/46swtm92

Keywords:

Load forecasting; Load growth; Electricity consumption

Abstract

This study investigates the seismic performance of the SMART Tunnel under near-field earthquake conditions, with a focus on how tunnel burial depth influences fragility, crack development, and structural response. The research began with a comprehensive literature review to establish a theoretical basis for seismic analysis and soil-structure interaction. Four 2D finite element models representing tunnel depths of 0 m, 5 m, 10 m, and 12.2 m were developed using ABAQUS, with realistic soil and structural properties. Seismic input was obtained from the PEER Ground Motion Database and processed through SeismoSignal to generate acceleration-time histories and response spectra. Time-history analyses were then conducted to simulate tunnel behaviour under selected near-field earthquakes. Key structural responses, such as stress distribution and crack propagation, were analysed to evaluate damages. Fragility curves were developed for each model to assess the probability of damage under varying seismic intensities. The findings show that Model 4, located 12.2 m above the rock layer, performs the best due to its ability to accommodate larger displacements before failure, benefiting from increased flexibility in softer soils. In contrast, Model 1, placed directly on the bedrock, was the least effective, showing early collapse under lower seismic loads. These results emphasise the importance of depth and soil interaction in seismic tunnel design.

References

. A. Adnan, M. Z. Ramli, Y. Karimi Vahed, and S. K. Che Osmi, ‘Seismic Performance of Tunnel Lining under Long Distant Earthquake Effects’, in International Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IZII-50), Hamburg, Germany, 2015.

. S. Anudai Anuar, N. N. M. Salleh, M. A. Rahim, and N. F. Bawadi, ‘Awareness of the Seismic Effect on Existing High-rise Building in Georgetown Penang’, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 1303, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1303/1/012010.

. G. Awchat, A. Patil, A. More, and G. Dhanjode, ‘Incremental Dynamic Analysis and Seismic Fragility Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Frame’, Civil and Environmental Engineering, vol. 19, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.2478/cee-2023-0039.

. M. Z. bin Abu Bakar and Z. F. binti Mohamad, ‘Local government capacity for earthquake disaster risk reduction in Malaysia: Case studies in Bentong and Selayang areas’, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 97, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103987.

. K. Bhalla and K. Gleason, ‘Effects of vehicle safety design on road traffic deaths, injuries, and public health burden in the Latin American region: a modelling study’, The Lancet Global Health, vol. 8, no. 6, 2020, doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30102-9.

. P. Cartes, A. Chamorro, and T. Echaveguren, ‘Seismic risk evaluation of highway tunnel groups’, Natural Hazards, vol. 108, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11069-021-04770-1.

. M. M. Kassem, S. Beddu, J. H. Ooi, C. G. Tan, A. M. El-Maissi, and F. M. Nazri, ‘Assessment of seismic building vulnerability using rapid visual screening method through web-based application for Malaysia’, Buildings, vol. 11, no. 10, 2021, doi: 10.3390/buildings11100485.

. A. Manouchehrian and M. Cai, ‘Analysis of rockburst in tunnels subjected to static and dynamic loads’, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 9, no. 6, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2017.07.001.

. M. Mogheisi, H. Tavakoli, and E. Peyghaleh, ‘Fragility curve development of highway bridges using probabilistic evaluation (case study: Tehran City)’, Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 24, no. 6, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s42107-023-00603-7.

. A. Moayedifar, H. R. Nejati, K. Goshtasbi, and M. Khosrotash, ‘Seismic fragility and risk assessment of an unsupported tunnel using incremental dynamic analysis (IDA)’, Earthquake and Structures, vol. 16, no. 6, 2019, doi: 10.12989/eas.2019.16.6.705.

. M. R. M. Noh, S. Rambat, I. S. B. A. Halim, and F. Ahmad, ‘Seismic Risk Assessment in Malaysia: A Review’, Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, vol. 25, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.37934/araset.25.1.6979.

. P. J. C. Roque, R. R. Violanda, C. C. Bernido, and J. L. A. Soria, ‘Earthquake occurrences in the Pacific Ring of Fire exhibit a collective stochastic memory for magnitudes, depths, and relative distances of events’, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 637, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2024.129569.

. F. Tongkul, ‘An Overview of Earthquake Science in Malaysia’, ASM Science Journal, vol. 14, 2021, doi: 10.32802/asmscj.2020.440.

. Y. Zhai, L. Zhang, B. Cui, H. Zhang, and T. Ma, ‘Evolution criteria of overall damage of concrete gravity dam body and foundation under near-fault ground motion’, Structures, vol. 43, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.06.052.

. N. S. Zulkhibri, M. I. Adiyanto, and H. A. Roslan, ‘The Effect of Seismic Design on Total Cost of Structural Work for Medium Rise Apartment Building’, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 1303, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1303/1/012014.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-26

Issue

Section

Articles