Comparison of Accuracy between Random Forest Method and K-Nearest Neighbors Method for Recognizing Solar Panel Energy Conversion Temperature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30743/3atqqr87Keywords:
Pattern Recognition; Random Forest Method; KNN Method; Solar Panel Temperature; Energy ConversionAbstract
This study analyzes the classification of temperature image pattern recognition on solar panels to improve the accuracy of energy conversion performance affected by weather changes. The process begins by capturing the surface temperature image of the panel as primary data, which is then processed through the pattern recognition stage. The pattern recognition method is chosen to detect and understand patterns in temperature images that will be used as datasets. This study also compares the results of pattern recognition using the Random Forest classification method with the K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) method, in order to build an effective model in analyzing images based on weather temperature in Medan City. The results of the study obtained that the solar panel produced a maximum output of 15.74 Wp at 12:00 pm, when the temperature tends to be higher and sunlight is optimal. Then the results of the random forest method showed good performance with an accuracy of 84% and the K-Nearest Neighbors method had an accuracy of 78%.
References
I. Laabab, S. Ziani, and A. Benami, “Solar panels overheating protection: a review,” Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, vol. 29, no. 1. 2023.
R. Dallaev, T. Pisarenko, N. Papež, and V. Holcman, “Overview of the Current State of Flexible Solar Panels and Photovoltaic Materials,” Materials, vol. 16, no. 17. 2023.
D. Maizana, A. Rezky, S. M. Putri, H. Satria, and M. Mungkin, “Stability analysis of smart grid management system on campus building,” Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 30, no. 3, 2023.
M. Mungkin, H. Satria, D. Maizana, M. Isa, Syafii, and M. Y. Puriza, “Analysis of the feasibility of adding a grid-connected hybrid photovoltaic system to reduce electrical load,” Int. J. Power Electron. Drive Syst., vol. 14, no. 2, 2023.
H. Satria, R. Syah, N. A. Silviana, and Syafii, “Sensitivity of solar panel energy conversion at sunrise and sunset on three weather fluctuations in equatorial climate,” Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng., vol. 13, no. 3, 2023.
J. Huang, K. Zeng, Z. Zhang, and W. Zhong, “Solar panel defect detection design based on YOLO v5 algorithm,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 8, 2023.
A. Sekulić, M. Kilibarda, G. B. M. Heuvelink, M. Nikolić, and B. Bajat, “Random forest spatial interpolation,” Remote Sens., vol. 12, no. 10, 2020.
S. Georganos et al., “Geographical random forests: a spatial extension of the random forest algorithm to address spatial heterogeneity in remote sensing and population modelling,” Geocarto Int., vol. 36, no. 2, 2021.
D. R. Anamisa, A. Jauhari, and F. Ayu Mufarroha, “K-Nearest Neighbors Method for Recommendation System in Bangkalan’s Tourism,” ComTech Comput. Math. Eng. Appl., vol. 14, no. 1, 2023.
M. Kim, Y. Kim, H. Kim, W. Piao, and C. Kim, “Evaluation of the k-nearest neighbor method for forecasting the influent characteristics of wastewater treatment plant,” Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., vol. 10, no. 2, 2016.
M. Schonlau and R. Y. Zou, “The random forest algorithm for statistical learning,” Stata J., vol. 20, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1536867X20909688.
E. S. Almutairi and M. F. Abbod, “Machine Learning Methods for Diabetes Prevalence Classification in Saudi Arabia,” Modelling, vol. 4, no. 1, 2023.
J. J. S. De Figueiredo et al., “Automatic detection and imaging of diffraction points using pattern recognition,” Geophys. Prospect., vol. 61, no. SUPPL.1, 2013.
I. H. Sourov et al., “EEG‐Based Preference Classification for Neuromarketing Application,” Comput. Intell. Neurosci., vol. 2023, no. 1, 2023.
N. Ukey, Z. Yang, B. Li, G. Zhang, Y. Hu, and W. Zhang, “Survey on Exact kNN Queries over High-Dimensional Data Space,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 2. 2023.
D. Rahmawati, M. Puspa Putri I, M. Ulum, and K. Joni, “Identification and Classification of Pathogenic Bacteria Using the K-Nearest Neighbor Method,” JEEE-U (Journal Electr. Electron. Eng., vol. 5, no. 1, 2021.
P. Y. Chen, C. P. Tung, J. H. Tsao, and C. J. Chen, “Assessing future rainfall intensity–duration–frequency characteristics across taiwan using the k‐nearest neighbor method,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 11, 2021.
R. Andrian, D. Maharani, M. A. Muhammad, and A. Junaidi, “Butterfly identification using gray level co-occurrence matrix (Glcm) extraction feature and k-nearest neighbor (knn) classification,” Regist. J. Ilm. Teknol. Sist. Inf., vol. 6, no. 1, 2020.
R. Bakare, V. V. Shete, I. Kompatsiaris, and M. Tsolaki, “Revolutionizing the Alzheimer’s Disease Stage Diagnosis through AI-Powered approach,” Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl. Eng., vol. 12, no. 13s, 2024.
M. Wang et al., “Functional localization in the brain of a cynomolgus monkey based on spike pattern recognition with machine learning,” J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput., vol. 14, no. 11, 2023.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Habib Satria, Rika Rosnelly, Wanayumini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
